Dutch new-build home sales fell 11.2% year over year in Q2, while the average price was €514,000
Impact level
⚪ Background
What happened
Statistics Netherlands (CBS), Kadaster and Eurostat reported on October 5, 2026, that nearly 5,700 new-build homes were sold in the Netherlands in Q2 2026, down 11.2% year over year and marking the fourth consecutive quarterly decline. More than 59,000 existing homes changed hands over the same period, up 2.7% year over year, following growth of 8.7% in the previous quarter. The average price of a new-build home was €514,000, up 4.7% year over year; the average price of an existing home was €492,000, up 4.2%. There were 64,600 home sales in total, with a combined transaction value of €31.8 billion. [1]
Seller impact
- InferenceNew-build home sales have fallen for four consecutive quarters, while prices are still up 4.7%. This suggests that weaker transactions do not mean demand has disappeared, but that supply or affordability is constrained: sellers targeting demand for ancillary products and services related to Dutch new-build homes face pressure on order volumes, while prices remain relatively sticky. [1]
- FactGrowth in existing-home sales slowed from 8.7% to 2.7%, while average price growth eased only slightly (5.2%→4.2%). The Netherlands’ overall increase of 4.3% was close to the EU average of 4.7%; Germany was at just 0.6% and France at -0.8%, showing pronounced differences in demand across the region. [1]
Suggested action
For an assessment of housing-related demand in the Netherlands, you can download quarterly price and transaction indexes from CBS StatLine and check the trend over the past four quarters before reaching a conclusion.
Evidence that would disprove the assessment
- Assessment 1:This assessment would no longer hold if CBS data for the next quarter showed year-over-year growth in new-build home sales, or if average price growth slowed markedly.
- Assessment 2:If CBS or Eurostat revises the Q2 data so that the gap between the Netherlands and the EU average widens substantially, this comparison should be corrected.